 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| home page | about us | documents | miscellaneous | sitemap |
|
|
|
|
|
| home page | about us | documents | miscellaneous | sitemap |
 |
The Internet as a Cultural Space |
|
| |
| 1 From academic temple to mass media |
|
When examining network culture "from the inside out", the main interest was not the Internet´s influence upon its social surroundings, but the network´s special, dynamically changing interplay made up of technological and social conventions. Following on from a general explorative ethnographic observation of the network´s structures, developmental dynamics and cultural idiosyncrasies (cf. Helmers 1994), we chose two areas for an in-depth analysis of recurring cultural patterns of meaning in the "cultural space of the Internet": the Unix operating system and netiquette rules of correct behaviour. Choosing netiquette as a field of research might seem more reasonable than a somewhat esoteric operating system. Under the premise that an Internet culture transcending the boundaries of singular phenomena has developed, it should be possible, however, to find their characteristics in all areas of the cultural space - including the network nodes´ operating technology.
The most elementary feature of network culture is the priority of a flow of data which is as optimal and unhindered as possible. Not only is this an archetypical functional aim of networking, it i!s an imperative factor which is a leitmotif running through the development of network technology at both host and client level as well as the social forms of interaction. Depending upon the referential area, the free flow of data is manifested both verbally as the "Blue Ribbon Campaign for Free Speech Online", as "Fight Spam", as "Free Software", as the castigation of "lurkers", as "Information wants to be free" and as the endeavour for as much connectivity as possible, the boundaries of network technology permitting, realised in the guise of "open architecture networking" (cf. Leiner et. al 1998). When speaking of idiosyncrasies of network culture, the important matter is a portrayal of culture as a result described in the present tense, as is customary in the field of ethnography. At the time when the project was being developed in 1994/5, the chosen areas Unix and netiquette were important mainstays for the deduction of cultural patterns within the Internet using ethnographic methods1. In the course of its development, starting out as an "academic curiosity" (Tanenbaum 1997, 13) the Internet has changed into an exclusive research network and recently, into a ubiquitous network that has become part of everyday life for many people (cf. for example Leiner et. al 1998; Helmers & Hofmann 1996; Finne, Grassmuck & Helmers 1996; Rilling 1996; Lovink & Schultz 1997; Krempl 1997). The World Wide Web system, whose interface now includes other Internet services (Email, FTP, News) and is the typical gateway to the network world, is not only dominant nowadays as far as its appearance is concerned, but in 1994 it was very new and not significant enough from a network cultural point of view for it to merit any attention as a starting or focal point for !research on Internet culture. Even today, with widely developed WWW systems, this field is still largely neglected in favour of more comprehensible social spaces such as IRC or MUDs which are studied more closely and in more detail (cf. Turkle 1996; Reid !1991 and 1994; Müller 1996; Seidler 1994). The Internet´s cultural foundations, which were laid during the days of the research network, are - seen from an archaeological point of view - an old cultural layer, but by no means buried and cut off from what is going on today. Not only is this cultural layer as alive in personam and involved in the goings-on of important "coordinating points" of network development where old flags are kept flying, for example IETF or Internet Society committees, news administration or at the local sysadmin level, as it ever was. Rather, this old class is very much alive and continues to be influential upon development beyond a personal level, as will be outlined below. On the other hand, the cultural foundation, made up of the free flow of data and the best connectivity possible, is such a resistant basis due to its open form that it will be depicted in everything erected on this historic foundations. This is basically nothing but the old kung fu trick of victory through flexibility. | |
| 2 Unix - Live Free or Die |
|
The development of Internet "nodes", i.e. the computers connected to the network, occurred at the same time as the development of data transmission. Unix machines played a prominent role in these nodal points. At around t!he same time - the late Sixties and early Seventies - American universities, research institutes and firms begin work on the initial development of data transmission techniques for the ARPANET as part of research programmes instantiated by the Department of Defense (DoD) and - without the DoD's help or participation - the Unix operating system is conceived in the Bell Labs (cf. Leiner et al. 1998, Cerf, no year given). During the following period, Unix, which already included the idea of networking as an essential feature, was developed further in such a way that it became a kind of "ideal" host system for the Internet. Unix was not only a system for using the network, but thanks to the fact that it was used as a developer's tool, it was also an important system for developing networks. In 1994, Unix celebrated its silver anniversary.
The following text deals with the importance of Unix for network culture and Unix user groups, i.e. with cultural parallels between Unix as the operating system layer and the Internet as the networking layer. Speaking at the operating system level: Unix is a combination of programmes based on a necessary smallest common denominator. "It has been said that UNIX is not an operating system as much as it is a way of thinking. In The UNIX Programming Environment, Kernighan and Pike write that the heart of the UNIX philosophy 'is the idea that the power of a system comes more from the relationship among programs than from the programs themselves.' ...Almost all of the utility programs that run under UNIX share the same user interface - a minimal interface to be sure - but one that allows them to be strung together in pipelines to do jobs that no single program could do alone." Tim O'Reilly (Peek et al. 1997, 8; vgl. auch Hauben und Hauben 1977, 133ff.)This network computer view of things is phrased as a model in Internet RFC 1, "Host Software", written in 1969: "The simplest connection we can imagine is when the local HOST acts as if it is a TTY and has dialed up the remote HOST" (RFC! 1). In the Eighties, a Unix firm came up with an advertising slogan seen from the network level's perspective: "The Network is the Computer". | |
 | 2.1 Space Travel |
|
Just as legend has it that the first Internet RFC was written in a bathroom at night (Hafner & Lyon 1996, 144), there is also a charming legend on the origin of Unix. The genesis stories all correspond to a certain pattern: Something great begins very humbly, with unsuitable means, not as a result of order, diligence and doing things by the book, but rather nonchalantly and playfully, and is connected to certain people whose names belong to these yarns. The heroes whose names are passed on are revered programming artists (cf. "Who's Who" in Libes & Ressler 1989, 29 ff.; Molzberger 1990). When combining this pattern with the expression "hack"2, it becomes apparent as to exactly why this type of stories are repeated, whereas stories that do not concur with hacking are either modified to fit the pattern or not passed on altogether.3
One day, in the summer of 1969, Ken Thompson was playing Space Travel and got stuck between Mars and an asteroid belt. The inadequacy of computer systems at the time annoyed him.4 "The machine wasn't up to it. The software wasn't up to it. And he was going to solve the problem." (Salus 1994a, 5) Ken Thompson worked at Bell Telephone Laboratories as part of a group of computer developers, among them Dennis Ritchie and Rudd Canaday. A PDP-7 which has since gone down in history was standing unused in another working group's rooms. With this PDP-7, the developmental process began on what would later become Unix, "just for fun", according to Dennis Ritchie (Salus 1994a, 7). As AT & T saw no business possibilities for Unix, the system's source code was given to anyone interested in it under the condition that there would be "no bug fixes, no support". AT & T's attitude is described as part of Unix history: "Oh, just something we happen to do for our own internal use. You can have a copy if you want to, but if you got problems, don't bother us." (Henry Spencer, in Hauben & Hauben 1997, 140). "BTL didn't really have a distribution policy in the early days, you got a disk with a note: Here's your rk05, Love, Dennis. If UNIX crapped on your rk05, you'd write to Dennis for another." (Andrew Tanenbaum in Libes & Ressler 1989, 13). Nevertheless, UNIX soon became a registered trademark of AT & T, the manual pages were protected by copyright, the "unauthorized use or distribution of the code, methods and concepts contained in or derived from th!e UNIX product" illegal. (Libes & Ressler 1989, 20, 22-23) Tim O'Reilly and Jerry Peek in the introduction to their 1073-page standard work UNIX Power Tools (Peek et al. 1997, 1): "UNIX is unique in that it wasn't designed as a commercial operating system meant to run application programs, but as a hacker's toolset, by and for programmers. (...) When Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie first wrote UNIX at AT&T Bell Labs, it was for their own use, and for their friends and co-workers. Utility Programs were added by various people as they had problems to solve. Because Bell Labs wasn't in the computer business, source code was given out to universities for a nominal fee. Brilliant researchers wrote their own software and added it to UNIX in a spree of creative anarchy that hasn't been equaled since, except perhaps in the introduction of the X window System." 5Many people contributed to the further development of Unix. After it first started out "as a kind of after-hours project" (Titz 1996, 202), there were soon first started out "as a kind of after-hours project" (Titz 1996, 202), there were soon many universities and firms that worked with and developed Unix. One of the most important academic centres of development was Berkeley, where BSD Berkeley Unix originated in the late Seventies (cf. Libes & Ressler 1989, 16ff.; Salus 1994a, 137 ff., 153 ff.). A free system with published source code is not a "static operating system that limits users, but rather invites them to come up with individual solutions to their own requirements." (Roland Dyroff in Holz, Schmitt & Tikkart 1998, 13). The numerous software developments that were very often put at the user's disposal free software in addition to the operating system itself, confirm the impact of the invitational impulse. The meeting of Unix and the Internet, which complement each other as parts of a whole, was extremely fruitful for their respective development. In summary, it can be said that "some of the Unix operating system's greater strengths, however, stem not from its simplicity, but from the truly collaborative nature of its development and evolution." (Salus 1994b) This collaborative development could not be foreseen at the beginning, but due to the special nature of the development environment, it was discernible as a vague possibility on the horizon. "UNIX is essentially a two-man operation at present. Anyone who contemplates a UNIX installation should have available some fairly sophisticated programming talent if any modifications planned, as they almost certainly will be. The amount of time that we can spend working on behalf of, or even advising, new UNIX users is limited. Documentation exists, but never seems to be complete. There have been rumblings from certain departments about taking over the maintenance of UNIX for the public (i.e., other Labs users) but I cannot promise anything." (Dennis Ritchie, 1972) 6 | |
| 2.2 The network world in miniature and networkinh with others |
Unix boxes, in contrast to the PCs and Macs popular today which have been conceived with standalone and single-user use in mind, are geared towards multi-tasking and multi-user use. Unix has registered users, ken and dmr for example. Using Unix, the CPU processes tasks "simultaneously" using timesharing, instead of using the batch mode customary at that time to process them in succession. Unix system users have a home directory whose environment they can create according to their own personal preferences. The Unix permission system sets the file access permissions read, write execute for users, group and world and is one of the possibilities for collaborative work inherent to the system's design. Mail communication7 between system users was already in existence in the earliest versions of Unix (cf. Salus 1994a, 105).
"Bob started saying, 'Look, my problem is how I get a computer that's on a satellite net and a computer on a radio net and a computer on the ARPANET to communicate uniformly with each other without realizing what's going on in between?'" (Vinton Cerf über TCP/IP-Mitentwickler Robert Kahn in Hafner & Lyon 1996, 223).What appears as a platform-independent endeavour as a cultural characteristic of the Internet seen from the data transmission level; correspondingly, on the operating system level, portability is one of Unix's strong points that is mentioned over and over again. The endogamous networking technique, as it were, used in the world of Unix was UUCP; Unix-to-Unix-CoPy, developed at Bell Labs in 1976, and still used by some Unix users. UUCP provided a technological method for the Unix Users Network developed in 1979 - Usenet. The early transatlantic diffusion routes for Usenet's idea and software were simple: "Usenet in Europe (...) was born from a tape I took with me from San Francisco USENIX conference (...) back to Amsterdam" (Usenet pioneer Teus Hagen at the Mathematisch Centrum Amsterdam, cit. in Hauben & Hauben 1997, 182; for more on the importance of interpersonal networks, cf. Schenk, Dahm & Sonje 1997). The Internet data transmission protocols TCP/IP were implemented in the widespread Berkeley Unix 4.2 BSD in 1983 with financial aid provided by the American Department of Defense (for more on the role of TCP/IP in 4.2 BSD Berkeley Unix, cf. Santifaller 1995, 31f.). "The incorporation of TCP/IP into the Unix BSD system releases proved to be a critical element in dispersion of the protocols in the research community. Much of the CS research community began to use Unix BSD for their day-to-day computing environment. Looking back, the strategy of incorporating Internet protocols into a supported operating system for the research community was one of the key elements in the successful widespread adaption of the Internet." (Leiner et al. 1998)Bill Joy, who worked on the TCP/IP implementation project, got together with Stanford graduates to set up the firm Stanford University Network Microsystems - Sun Microsystems, one of the most important Unix businesses8 . "The first SUN machines were shipped with the Berkeley version of UNIX, complete with TCP/IP. When Sun included network software as part of every machine it sold and didn't charge separately for it, networking exploded." (Hafner & Lyon 1996, 250) | |
| 2.3 Family trees |
|
The Unix family's genealogy is divided into different systems with subvariants thereof. Their relation to one another is unsystematic, which purists view as unsightly. "The different versions of the UN*X brand operating system are numbered in a logical sequence: 5, 6, 7, 2, 2.9, 3, 4.0, III, 4.1, V.2 and 4.3." (Filipski 1986) More important than technical family ties and groups, however, is the fact that commercial and free Unices are worlds apart. Free Unices are the planned children of the Unix community. In the beginning, there was the Berkeley Software Distribution BSD. Offspring have names such as "FreeBSD" or "OpenBSD" or "Minix". Or Linux - originally "just a hackers' delight (Bentson 1994), "a small exercise to probe the potential of the i386 processor." (Torvalds 1995, 90).
"In the summer of 1991, the Finnish computer science student Linus Benedict Torvalds had no idea what a success story he was paving the way for. He only had a computer which he didn't really know what to do with, a bit too much time on his hands, freshly-gleaned knowledge on the construction of operating systems and a lot of energy. And he had the possibility of publishing the results of his work all around the world - via the Internet. So it came about that in November 1991, the following news could be found in newsgroups on operating systems under the subject Linux Information Sheet: "There is a new Unix clone for 368-PCs. There's not much there yet, but enough to play around with. It can be found on the University of Helsinki's FTP server." (Titz 1996, 201)In contrast to the early days of Unix, Internet networking was already fully developed during the beginning of the Linux project, in which developers from all around the world participated. The method of development used for Linux, with thousands of part-time developers and parallellised debugging, spread across the globe and only connected via the Internet, is similar to a great big chattering bazaar with different days and approaches, actually works, and is even faster than the conventional cathedral method, in which a group of enlightened artists build!s stone upon stone and never allows a beta release out before the time is not finally right (Raymond 1997). GNU project components9, the X Window System and NetBSD were available via the Internet from the beginning and completed the Linux kernel, which was based upon Andrew Tanenbaum's free Minix system (Bentson 1994). Linux and the Internet are indivisibly connected twins. (Titz 1996, 207; cf. Torvalds 1995; Been 1995; Helmers & Seidler 1995). When asked about his motivation for continuing the Linux projec!t, Linus Torvalds answered as follows: "It's a very interesting project, and I get to sit there like a spider in its web, looking at the poor new users struggling with it. Mwbhahahhaaahaaa. No, seriously, what kept me going initially after I had 'completed' my first test-versions of Linux back in '91 was the enthusiasm of people, and knowing people find my work interesting and fun, and that there are people out there depending on me. That's still true today. And it really is technically interesting too-still, after these five years. New challenges, new things people need or find interesting. But the community is really what keeps me going." (Hughes & Shurtleff 1996) | |
| 2.4 Free software development |
The development of free software with published sources is traditional in the Unix field10. The field of free software, significant in network culture, extends Unix terrain in the narrow sense. The Internet's data transfer technology is also freely available. As closely the development of Internet culture is connected to Unix, it is also closely connected to the related areas of free software and the hacker tradition.
"'Free software' is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of 'free speech', not 'free beer'. 'Free software' refers to the users' freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. More precisely, it refers to three levels of freedom: The freedom to study how the program works and adapt it to your needs. The freedom to redistribute copies so you can share with your neighbor. The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvement to the public, so that the whole community benefits." (What is Free Software, http://www.gnu.ai.mit.edu/philosophy/free-sw.html)Free software comes with rules. The areas of development of free software are in accordance with certain patterns, as it is always about connectivity to existing projects, respecting other's territory and staking out one's own territory not too close to and not too far away from others (Raymond 1998). The basic rules of free software etiquette, the GNU General Public License11, were written by the Free Software Foundation12. It accompanies the GNU project, begun in 1984 (GNU stands for GNU's Not Unix), which gave birth to the popular GNU C compiler, the EMACS editor, closely linked to the classic AI language Lisp and the GNU Image Manipulation Program called The GIMP, similar to Photoshop. Linux as well is free software according to the GPL rules. | |
| 2.5 Celebrating the Silver Jubilee |
|
"An operating system burdened with 25 years' worth of nifty add-on programs is bound to have an awful lot of inconsistencies and overlapping functions." (Tim O'Reilly in Peek et al, 1997, 38). The Unix field exhibits astounding cultural persistence uncommon for an operating system. Notwithstanding all creativity and innovation, a tendency towards conservatively holding on to what has been attained can be seen.
Seen from a modern security aspect, a classic Unix system seems more like an Emmenthal cheese. It was not designed with rigid security concepts in mind, although its conception does not rule them out altogether (Garfinkel & Spafford 1991)13. The same cannot be said of the Internet's design, where the subject of security which had hitherto more or less been neglected, became one of the potentially largest problems where access by "average users" was concerned (Tanenbaum 1997, 597). "Unfortunately, modifying UNIX to be more secure means denying some of the freedom that has made it so attractive in the past" (Libes & Ressler 1989, 301). The communicative qualities which are traditionally part of every Unix system are now up for debate in the conflict between openness versus security. Guest logins have long since been past history. Good old telnet is not bug-proof and is increasingly being replaced by the secure shell ssh. Warez pirates or pornographers who could gain access to the system are arguments for disabling anonymous FTP upload. Today, the user information services who, what and finger14 are seen as security risks and also violate data protection concepts, which are becoming increasingly important, which is why the finger query port is closed on so many systems: "finger: connect: Connection refused". Dick Haight, who wrote the Unix command "find", among other things (cit. in Hauben & Hauben 1997, 142), describes the advantages of the Golden Age of openness: "That, by the way, was one of the great things about UNIX in the early days: people actually shared each other's stuff. It's too bad that so many sites now have purposefully turned off the read privileges in order to keep their ideas from being stolen. Not only did we learn a lot in the old days from sharing material, but we also never had to worry about how things really worked because we always could go read the source. That's still the only thing that matters when the going gets tough."Even if venerable old Unix still has a large following in computer freak circles, the system's foundations are still seen as out-of-date, especially the large, monolithic kernel's architecture. The ability to show graphics was added, but only poorly integrated. And, as mentioned before, it does not comply with modern security demands. But because there is no other developer's system with comparable advantages curre!ntly available, Unix is still in use. On the horizon are developments that can only be described as prototypes and as yet far from practical usability. In the field of free software, two new system developments have roused particular interest: Hurd and Plan 9. Hurd ( http://www.gnu.ai.mit.edu/software/hurd/hurd.html) is an offshoot of the MIT's GNU project and closely connected to the name Richard Stallman15. After waiting for idle announcements, the first test release was finally presented in 1996. Hurd's design plan is the replacement of the Unix kernel by a smaller, faster Mach kernel, achieved by connecting servers which, as a modular system, depict a more up-to-date operating system design than the old Unix architecture. GNU Mach is based on the University of Utah's Mach 4 kernel. Equally, although more extensively than Hurd, the Plan 9 system places its hopes upon distributed and networked working as an integral part of system design ( http://cm.bell-labs.com/plan9/) Plan 9, "an operating system for the 21st century" (nota bene not for 1995 or 1998, such as is the case with Windows releases), comes from Bell Labs and is connected to the name Dennis Ritchie. And Ken Thompson has joined in as well per 16. The fact that renowned data artistes are giving the projects some of their aura's radiance can be seen as a certain bonus, but does not necessarily have to mean an automatic success, as the counterexample !Linux has shown. "UNIX is weak in the end-user interface area" (Severance o. J.)The interface's weakness and the low level of user-friendliness as perceived from a modern point of view was seen quite differently in the beginning. In contrast to conventional systems, Unix was seen as especially user-friendly. What later became the weakness compared with modern systems was no coincidence. Unix has remained a system designed by experts for experts, "a programmer's dream" (Garfinkel !& Spafford 1991, 7). Its power is not all that apparent in the so-called end-user field, where graphics are created, a text is written and layouted, a spreadsheet made or a game of chess played, which is why nobody outside of computer freak circles would ever think of buying a fine Sun machine which can cost as much as a mid-range car or even a house and is not able to do these menial tasks particularly well. In interviews, when Linus Torvalds stresses the fact that
In the world of Unix, as in other cultural groups, there is large esteem for oneself, combined with disdain for others who are culturally different. The Internet's data transmission technology is a world-wide success. The Internet's favourite operating system is not. With Microsoft's increasing market leadership, the disdain for others grows steadily. "I have experienced my fair share of bugs and disasters during my prime UNIX years of 1975-1985, but none of it was as futile and frustrating as a recent attempt to change a Windows PC running Exceed to use a three-button mouse. Plug and pray and pray and play", declared Andrew Hume, USENIX president in 1996, in the organization's magazine ";login:" (Kolstad 1996). Microsoft bashing is a popular sport. Andrew Tanenbaum called MS-DOS "mushy": "Mush DOS" (Tanenbaum during the EUUG conference in Helsinki 1987, cit. in Snoopy 1995, 32). The non-public nature of its source code (as is usual for every proprietary system) aside, Windows NT is verifiably criticised for its hardware performance, which is worse than that of Unix (Holz. Schmitt & Tikkart 1998, 19). NT is "unproductive and prone to errors", an article in a VDI association magazine (Aschendorf 1998, 71). | |
| 2.6 Fandom and Unix clt |
|
Only those who are dedicated to the Unix cause can overcome initial difficulties and attain sufficient competence to use the system. Who then becomes a Unix fan likes talking about Unix. Dedication to Unix is apparent in the use of /dev/null as an expression for nothingness in any form or of "booting" as a synonym for waking up in the morning. A person such as this calls at least one Unix-related badge or sticker their own. Unix fans are infected with "Unirexia nervosa": "The symptoms of this disorder are the interjection of nonsense words such as grep, awk, runrun and nohup by the victim into his or her speech; the misuse of ordinary words such as cat and lint; and the avoidance of uppercase letters." (Filipski 1986)
In computer freak circles, Unix enjoys a cult status. Numerous newsgroups are devoted to the discussion and development of Unix systems and application software. Unix-related subjects are discussed on national and international Internet Relay Channels around the clock. Wherever computer people meet, printed T-shirts and similar devotionalia are presented, for example at IETF meetings. BSD devils and graphics with slogans such as "Powered by vi" adorn WWW homepages. Cuddly Linux penguins live in the shop window of the Berlin Internet activist organisation Individual Network e.V., in many homes, they sit on sofas and desks or ac!company the Chaos Computer Club on its visit to Microsoft's stand at Cebit 98. There are numerous books, magazines, jokes, anecdotes and comics on the subject of Unix. And above all there are Unix user groups. These groups have a long tradition. | |
| 2.7 Unix User Groups |
|
When Bruce Sterling writes in "The Hacker Crackdown" (1992, 124): "UUCP is a radically decentralized, not-for-profit network of UNIX computers. There are tens of thousands of these UNIX machines" and "UNIX became a standard for the elite hacker and phone phreak" (Sterling 1992, 115), only one of the many facets of the Unix community is mentioned. As well as cloak-and-dagger groups such as the "Legion of DOOM"18, there is an international network of official Unix User Groups. Their meetings are informative as well as sociable and pleasant (cf. "UUG reports by Snoopy 1996). Unix User Groups depict a RL network of the Unix world. A map of the world with local user groups would more or less correspond to a map of the world with fully connected Internet areas and would, on the whole, show the general high-tech divide between wealthy and poor areas of the world as well as the boundaries of the national, social technology divide (for more on the "new wall, cf. Rötzer 1997). A mixture of expert groups and fan clubs, Unix User Groups have not only dealt with the operating system itself, but also networking aspects.
Transferred to a file system structure with the root level "/world/", large files in this directory would be the US American organisation USENIX, the AUUG (Australian Unix Users' group, recently renamed to Users' Group for UNIX and Open Systems, keeping the acronym), the CUUG (Canadian Unix Users' Group) and the European Unix Group EUUG, renamed to EurOpen. EurOpen is the umbrella organisation for all nationally organised groups in Europe, the Mediterranean and Minor Asia. Representative of the aims of all the other groups, the organization's aim of the German UNIX Users' Group(http://www.guug.de), founded in 1984, is quoted here: "...to further academic research, technical development and communication of open computer systems, especially those initiated by UNIX. Sorting files by date shows the geographic diffusion paths the Unix system took, beginning with the first USENIX meeting in 1974, later, the AUUG follow, meetings since 1975, UKUUG since 1976, NLUUG since 1987, EUUG only since 1981 etc. Sorting the /world/europen/ subdirectory alphabetically with "ls" would return the following list of names: 19 /welt/EurOpen/: AMUUG Armenian UNIX Users' Group AlUUG Algerian Unix Users' Group UUGA UNIX User's Group Austria BUUG Belgium Unix Users' Group. BgUUG Bulgarian Unix Users' Group HrOpen Croatian Open Systems Users' Group CsUUG Czechia Unix Users' Group DKUUG Danish UNIX-systems User Group FUUG Finnish Unix Users' Group AFUU French Unix Users' Group GUUG German Unix Users' Group. HUUG Hungarian Unix Users' Group. ICEUUG Icelandic Unix Users' Group IUUG Irish Unix Users' Group. AMIX Israeli Unix Users' Group I2U Italian Unix Users' Group. LUUG Luxembourg Unix Users' Group NLUUG Netherlands Unix Users' Group NUUG Norwegian Unix Users' Group Pl-Open Polish Unix Users' Group PUUG Portuguese Unix Users' Group. GURU Romanian Unix Users' Group. SUUG Russian Unix Users' Group. EurOpen.SK Slovakian Unix Users' Group EurOpen.SE Swedish Unix Users' Group. /ch/open Swiss Unix Users' Group. TNUUG Tunisian Unix Users' Group. TRUUG Turkish Unix Users' Group. UKUUG UK Unix Users' Group.The taxonomy Location-Unix(flavour)-U-G is conspicuous. Out of 29 EurOpen group names all in all, 22 are in accordance with the traditional pattern, five names are reformatory "Open-" renamings and only the Italian and Israeli21 User Groups have non-systematic names. Other groups as well, such as BeLUG (Berlin Linux Users' Group), TLUG (Tokyo Linux Users' Group), SALUG (South Australia Unix Users' Group) SVLUG (Silicon Valley Unix Users' Group), SUG (Sun Users' Group) and STUG (Software Tools Users' Group) follow the naming pattern. In contrast to Usenet, where names play a central role (cf. Hoffmann 1997), the schematic taxonomy of Unix User Groups is as unnecessary as the traditional taxonomy of the German Research Network (according to the pattern Type-Place.de, e.g. wz-berlin, uni-hannover, rwth-aachen.de etc.). The chosen name has an informative function ra!ther than an aesthetic one. Local newsgroups named "announce", "marketplace" or "misc" can be found globally. The list of newsgroups( http://www.canada.mensa.org/~news/hyperactive/h_cuug.html) of the Canadian CUUG, whose name is in accordance with the Unix group name pattern, follows this schematic convention. "List of cuug.* newsgroups22 cuug.announce Canadian Unix Users Group announcements. (Moderated) cuug.answers Canadian Unix Users Group helpful documents. (Moderated) cuug.help Canadian Unix Users Group questions. (Moderated) cuug.jobs Canadian Unix Users Group employment. (Moderated) cuug.marketplace Canadian Unix Users Group forsale and wanted. (Moderated) cuug.misc Canadian Unix Users Group general. (Moderated) cuug.networking Canadian Unix Users Group networking. (Moderated) cuug.sig Canadian Unix Users Group special interest groups.(Moderated)"The order upon which the Internet, computing and programming are based forms the necessary counterpoint to hacking. Both elements, as a pair of opposites, are an integral part of Internet culture. Respecting their rules is the prerequisite for belonging. Knowing the rules is a prerequisite for wilfully breaking them, and possibly being generally respected by all for it. Ignorance of the rules can be seen as ignorance and stupidity, which is deplored. Newbies who cannot know the rules are shown them. | |
| 3 Rules and order |
|
Netiquette describes the appropriate behaviour regarded as proper in the networking world based upon a minimal consensus as regards proper behaviour necessary for attaining as optimal a flow of data as possible when connectivity is as optimal as possible. Filtering or blocking certain content as a censorship measure disturbs the flow of data (cf. Tanenbaum 1997, 22f.; Shade 1996; Sandbothe 1996)http://www.eff.org). Disturbances in this sense are data flows that are "unnecessarily" brought about, such as massive mail spamming, crossposting in newsgroups, long idle times on IRC servers, disuse of less frequented FTP mirror sites created especially to relieve the primary site, list or news postings formatted in special system-dependent formats which are not generally readable, unnecessary questions on subjects already included in FAQ repositories or ignoring the rule that English is the language used in international network forums. The examples given refer to actions seen as disturbances. Not acting can also be regarded as a disturbance, personified by so-called lurkers23. They disturb the flow of data by taking data given to the network by others without giving data back themselves. As the Internet works on the basis of general reciprocity, lurkers behave dysfunctionally.
"The principal paradigm of the Net is not control but dissemination." (Interrogate the Internet 1996, 129). Social sanctioning possibilities of stopping the disruptive behaviour shown by Net users! that deviate from that regarded as self-evident are few and far between: flaming, denouncement or cutting them off altogether. Some solutions are developed by guardians of the rules, for example cancelbots, which are used on Usenet for postings that are against the rules but can also be abused as a method for censoring unwanted content (for more on the cancelbot campaign against Scientology critics cf. Donnerhacke 1996). Limiting or filtering measures have little hold in a system that is designed with the free flow of data in mind. Users can be sanctioned against by systems administrators locally, bur not network-wide. As far as Netiquette texts are concerned, the question as to the feasibility of rules formulated therein by sanctioning deviants is irrelevant. Rather, texts are based upon an integrative aim, which tries to appeal at respecting what has been created and make people see the advantages of network behaviour that is beneficial to all. It is expected that the precious common property of the free flow of data is respected by everyone on all levels. On this basis, the most important, "most official" (Djordjevic 1998, 18) collection of Internet rules, both for developers and users alike, the "Requests for Comments" (RFC), exist, which deal with all fundamental and mostly technical matters of networking. The first RFC, titled "Host Software", was published in 1969, written by Stephen D. Crocker, who was at the time Secretary of the Network Working Group (NWG), which sent the texts by surface mail. RFCs are an invitation to collaborate, publicly addressed to everyone on the network, according to the network´s cultural values of interactivity, connectivity, cooperation. RFCs are more or less "free textware". The form of the RFC systems, which still continues today, forms a network of rules such as the computer network forms the Internet with RFC conventions or data transmission procedures as a common bind holding it together. RFC states that in the RFC form, all con!tent is possible24. Steve Crocker, author of this third RFC as well, comments RFC 3´s message around 20 years later in 1987, as part of RFC 1000: "The basic ground rules were that anyone could say anything and that nothing was official." | |
| 3.1 Symbols of belonging |
"John Black of Oracle (VP Telecommunications) held a very good keynote address. It was about ´A Manager´s View of System Administration´. At the beginning of the speech, he was wearing a suit and tie. Then he said ´OK, now you all know that I´m a manager´ and quickly took his jacket and tie off .... to the audience´s great amusement. Then he paid us lots of compliments: As systems administrators, we were at the forefront of technology, we had our hands on the buttons and ultimately, we controlled the future of UNIX." (Snoopy 1995, 191; 7. LISA USENIX Conference, Monterey, 1993 25)The way an insider speaks and acts gives clues as to his insider status. Knowledge as to the world of networking and software, "Techspeak" and a fitting outward appearance. Although all attention, passion and exertion is directed towards the programme, a consensus has formed in the Unix world as to the appropriate look in the world of otherwise profane things. As in every cultural group, tribal colours and costumes give clues as to one´s cultural status. For Unix users, there is an appropriate look, e.g. as befits one´s station. Neither Rolex nor tweed suit, no, in this group it is T-shirts, sandals and a beard.26. "It has often been said that if God had a beard, he would be a UN*X programmer." (Filipski 1986)The style of clothing is functional, says "dress for comfort" and corresponds to what is called the "comfortable leisure style of the hippie generation" in our society. To be especially snobby is to dress in exactly the opposite manner, as is often remarked upon when speaking of the "Father of the Internet", Vinton Cerf. Regional differences from the dress code at *UUG meetings are also noted, for example the "German trend towards formalism including all external attributes (suit, tie etc.)" (Snoopy 1995, 15) The Unix look is a universal computer look; beyond all functionality ascribed to it, it is a symbol for the programme´s primate. This style, then, is seen as being "correct" at IETF meetings as well. As part of an RFC published in 1994 it was made the official dress code after an increase in tie-wearers at IETF meetings (cf. Hofmann 1998). "The Tao of IETF. A Guide for New Attendees of the Internet Engineering Task Force" has the following to say about the dress code: "Seriously though, many newcomers are often embarrassed when they show up Monday morning in suits, to discover that everybody else is wearing t-shirts, jeans (shorts, if weather permits) and sandals. There are those in the IETF who refuse to wear anything other than suits. Fortunately, they are well known (for other reasons) so they are forgiven this particular idiosyncrasy." (RFC 1718) 
Photos: Machtelt Garrels, IGUANA/Belgien, Sabine Helmers. Taken at "Hacking in Progress 1997", Almere/Holland. | |
| 3.2 Measures for announcing and implementing rules |
Actors saw opportunities for fixing netiquette guidelines by writing them down especially in situations which were seen as crises or transitional phases, when what had hitherto been a matter of course was no longer generally seen or accepted as a fundamental element of network communication. Netiquette texts are usually addressed at new users of an Internet area and are effective as an instrument for keeping up traditional values. A longish RFC, solely dedicated to the subject of Netiquette, was written in 1995 as a reaction to the widespread changes in the network´s population as a result of the Internet hype, an encyclical from the traditional centre of Internet development:
"In the past, the population of people using the Internet had "grown up" with the Internet, were technically minded, and understood the nature of the transport and the protocols. Today, the community of Internet users includes people who are new to the environment. These "Newbies" are unfamiliar with the culture and don't need to know about transport and protocols. In order to bring these new users into the Internet culture quickly, this Guide offers a minimum set of behaviors which organizations and individuals may take and adapt for their own use." (RFC 1855; vgl. auch Djordjevic 1998, 21f.)In combination, RFC 3 and RFC 1855 refer to an open development on the one hand which was possibly more marked in the beginning, and on the other to the meaning of the order based on the free flow of data, of which is said that it is understood by anyone belonging to that culture, but must be explained to those new to the network. Keepers of traditional network values are posted in many places on the network and have more than merely verbal power, for example "IRC admins", "channel ops", "news admins", newsgroup or mailing list moderators, or systems administrators27. As is the wont on the Internet, the Sysop´s positional status as a primus inter pares can be found throughout the network at its nodes. There, at the seat of power, is the traditional place of the "Bastard Operator from Hell" (BOFH), whose diabolical dblquote "clickety clickety" causes shivers to run down the spines of mere mortal network users28. The BOFH is neither didactic, nor does he try to educate users with pedagogical sensitivity. He is, however, arrogant and enjoys tormenting his dumb users with training methods. The newsgroup alt.sysadmin.recovery29, aimed at providing a possibility for letting of steam which accumulates when dealing with dumb users and nasty systems, is as equally popular as the BOFH. "1.1) What is alt.sysadmin.recovery? Alt.sysadmin.recovery is for discussion by recovered and recovering sysadmins. It is a forum for mutual support and griping over idiot lusers, stupid tech support, brain dead hardware and generally how stupid this idiotic job is. Think of it as a virtual pub, where we can all go after hours and gripe about our job. Since the concept of "after hours" (or, for that matter, "pubs") is an anathema for your average sysadmin, we have this instead.""User bashing" is a popular and widespread sport, as is "Microsoft bashing". The sysop is on the threshold of an elite circle of insiders and the culturally strange world outside, or, speaking as regards status, the world above and the world below in the murky depths of ignorance and ignorance towards the art of computing. Those who have studied RTFms, RFCs and FAQs and are willing to keep to the rules that have been made inside, can enter and participate in the free flow of data. Others, such as spammers, could be kept from the network by sysadmins: "Senders of mass mailings do not regard the Internet as a collective property, but only as a further distribution medium. In such cases, the only answer is to use administrative measures such as blocking sites." (Djordjevic 1998, 39). Simultaneously to cultural changes, the number of BOFHs is diminishing, as is that of fight spam activists. Ultimately, the Luser and DUI (Dumbest User Imaginable) has become a customer, and is therefore king. Door-openers in the widest sense of the word are - if successful - the hackers who enter systems and have more than merely verbal power. The still young sport of lock picking, in Germany, organized by the Friends of Locking Technology Club (Verein Sportsfreunde der Sperrtechnik, or SSDeV for short)30, is part of the "Hackers don´t like locked doors" tradition, as do system hackers or phone phreaks. In 1986, The Mentor writes about hacking in his manifesto as follows: "And then it happened... a door opened to a world...rushing through the phone line like heroin through an addict's veins, an electronic pulse is sent out..." In 1989, twenty years after the first RFC was written, the Internet Activities Board published RFC 1087, "Ethics and the Internet" as a "statement of policy". In this brief memo, the network´s cultural values such as "common infrastructure", "common interest and concern for its users", "responsibility every Internet user bears" as well as "access to and use of the Internet is a privilege and should be treated as such by all users of this system" can be found. The final paragraph is about the free flow of data as an important cultural value, about security measures that could possibly oppose this value and the IAB´s determination to act in case the appeal should fall on deaf ears: "to identify and to set up technical and procedural mechanisms to make the Internet more resistant to disruption. Such security, however, may be extremely expensive and may be counterproductive if it inhibits the free flow of information which makes the Internet so valuable." | |
| 3.3 New rules vs. old |
|
Seen from this background, the first "junk mails" and "spam attacks" with commercial advertising that appeared around 1994 seem quite sacrilegious: "Culture Shock on the Networks. An influx of new users and cultures could threaten the Internet's tradition of open information exchange." (Waldrop 1994, 879) Unsolicited and possibly mass-sent advertising such as that in the case of "Canter & Siegel"31 wastes network resources and the time of those who are not interested in receiving such mails. Thefts of collective and personal "computer time" such as these were vehemently followed up, as in the days of the research network, the "free flow of information" was not synonymous with the "free flow of my own data and money". The traditional sense of free-flow puts communal use before personal use. Technical filtering methods that stop junk and spam have been developed wherever junk has been distributed: Email (mail filters), WWW (Junk Buster, Anonymizer), IRC (ignore, channel kick and ban, site exclusion by IRC admins), Usenet (killfiles, cancelbots, site exclusion by News admins, "Usenet Death Penalty", cf. Hoffmann 1997a and 1997b). The fact that countermeasures have become fewer despite the rising amount of junk mail is an expression of cultural change.
The Netiquette that came into being around the time the that World Wide Web was developing can only be described as "insipid". This is connected to the defensive character of Web pages, as it were32. In contrast to junk mail, a junk page is unobtrusive. A classic text on Web page design from 1995 is "Top Ten Ways To Tell If you Have A Sucky Home Page" by Jeffrey Glover (http://www.glover.com/sucky.html), which deals with subjects such as "rdblquote obnoxious background music", the HTML BLINK tag or "bad, bad, bad, bad scans". Making Web pages is all about design. From HTML 1, a very simple language for constructing Web pages and therefore an easy possibility for participating on the WWW, a very complex structure has arisen, split by company policies. HTML is for HTML editors and design is for Web designers. Pages are supposed to look good and should really also load quickly. Whether they can be read with a text browser such as Lynx is something most Web designers don´t bother about. Lynx compatibility is only relevant in areas where traditional demands upon ubiquitous connectivity is known and esteemed as a value - unless Lynx users make up a clientele marketing strategists are interested in. Since the WWW has become the dominant Internet service rather than just another new face, search machines and other much clicked-upon sites have been able to position themselves as "strong network actors" on the WWW, new and influential centres of power - currently especially banner advertising centres - have come into being on the Internet, which could act as the new guardians of an order, whatever shape it might take (Rilling 1996; Winkler 1997b; Baumg?rtel 1998). At present, the market defines the WWW´s order. | |
| 4 ...Our continuing mission: To seek out knowledge of C, to explore strange UNIX commands, and to boldly code where no one has man page 4. |
Netscape´s announcement that they would publish their sources was the trigger for a new path taken by the free software scene: Open Source(
http://www/orpensource.org/).
33
"The prehistory of the Open Source campaign includes the entire history of Unix, Internet, free software, and the hacker culture.... The Future is here. Open-source software is an idea whose time has finally come. For twenty years it has been building momentum in the technical cultures that built the Internet and the World Wide Web. Now it's breaking out into the commercial world, and that's changing all the rules. Are you ready?"At least two questions remain that are of interest to cultural scientists: Firstly, the question as to what makes the Internet specific in a heterogeneous networking world, and secondly the question as to what remains - regardless of the rapid changes. If one tries to give uniformity a name in a network that is heterogeneity itself, then this programmatic heterogeneity must be part of a possible answer. The Internet pioneers and activists Leiner, Cerf, Clark, Kahn, Kleinrock, Lynch, Postel, Roberts and Wolff (1989) write in their "Short History of the Internet": "The Internet as we now know it embodies a key underlying technical idea, namely that of open architecture networking. (...) In an open-architecture network, the individual networks may be separately designed and developed and each may have its own unique interface which it may offer to users and/or other providers, including other Internet providers. Each network can be designed in accordance with the specific environment and user requirements of that network. There are generally no constraints on the types of network that can be included or on their geographic scope, although certain pragmatic considerations will dictate what makes sense to offer. (...) A key concept of the Internet is that it was not designed for just one application, but as a general infrastructure on which new applications could be conceived, as illustrated later by the emergence of the World Wide Web."Seen from a technical point of view, the Internet´s heterogeneity seems to be limitless, the only restrictions are pragmatic ones. To this marked degree, the characteristic integration of variety is idiosyncratic to the Internet. And everything should be possible on the application level as well. The power of integration does not stop at - seen from a conventional perspective - other types of media: Over the past years, print media, radio and television all went online. And in 1998, the German Telecom, hitherto a reluctant participant where the Internet was concerned, started a field test on Internet telephony. During the early Nineties, large experiments which attempted to establish exclusive networks, either technically or by way of access limitation, such as the Microsoft Network or Apple E-World, were scrapped in favour of the Internet. As the network has changed, so have the users. Anything that is non-contemporary is renewed or done away with. One of our project´s aims was to show that the Internet model works based on a closely-woven foundation of handed-down assumptions and rules, which works as a whole as to guarantee the free flow of data. It may be possib!le to predict that the free flow of data will be preserved in the Internet´s future. In view of the massive legal attempts at influencing what happens on the Net, this prediction could show itself to be a pipe-dream or hot air. The Internet´s death knell will sound at the latest when the technological foundations of open architecture networking mentioned above are relinquished. Where the Internet´s free or regulated ride is headed, remains open anyway. The network´s current state is still under the flag of the "free flow of information", albeit updated. The World Wide Web Consortium´s motto, "Leading the Web to its Full Potential"34 not only smacks of ancient entelechy, the motto is totally conformant to the Internet and therefore suitable for the future. Consequences of the cultural change as a result of adapting to changed users and usage, which can be seen from the Internet´s change from a research network to a global network, consist of attempts at integrating the new whilst keeping up the free flow of data. Transposed to the world of Star Trek, this could be compared to the constant attempts and the Kung-Fu qualities of the Starfleet heroes at peacefully coexisting and even cooperating with the Klingons. Singular elements of Internet cultu!re which do not have these qualities - and even if they are traditionally as important as Unix - could disappear down the next wormhole. And what comes out will be some kind of Next Generation. Possibly, this generation will wear T-shirts.
1
For more informationon the ethnographic framework and its implementation in the project cf. Helmers, Hoffamnn & Hofmann 1996, 19ff. und 26ff.
2
The compendium "On-line hacker Jargon File", http://www.ccil.org/jargon, has been a reliable source for ultimate definitions of hackerdom and ecerything connected to it since 1975. For more on the tradition of hackers and hacking, cf. Turkle 1984; Sterling 1992; Eckert et al. 1991
3
In der Internetentwicklung betrifft diese Form der
Vergangenheitsausblendung insbesondere die Anteile des Department of
Defense.
4
The fact that he was playing a space game gives the story a special touch. For more on the importance of SciFi in the computer and networking world, cf. Turkle 1984, 273-275; Barth & vom Lehn 1996; the compendium "MONDO 2000. A User´s Guide to the New Edge", edited by Rudi Rucker, R.U. Sirius & Queen Mu, especially on Cyberpunk Science Fiction.
5
Originally an MIT project, later X Consortium, now Open Group;
http://www.camb.opengroup.org/tech/desktop/Press_Releases/xccloses.htm
.
6
From Notes 2, a magnet tape marked "DMR", dates 15/3/1972,
http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/notes.html.
"I have no memory of why I wrote them, but they look very much like something to have in front of me for a talk somewhere, because of the references to slides. From the wording at the end ("the public, i.e. other Labs users"), I gather that it
intended to be internal to Bell Labs."
7
On Internet mail as a hack: "Between 1972 and the early 1980s, e-mail, or network mail as it was referred to,
was discovered by thousands of early users. (...) As cultural artifact,
electronic mail belongs in a category somewhere between found art and
lucky accidents. The ARPANET's creators didn't have a grand vision for the
invention of an earth-circling message-handling system. But once the first
couple of dozen nodes were installed, early users turned the system of
linked computers into a personal as well as a professional communications
tool. Using the ARPANET as a sophisticated mail system was simply a good
hack." (Hafner & Lyon 1996, 189).
8
Sun is generally seen as an example for successful, innovating technology development. One of the success factors: "According to Howard Lee, director of engineering, there were 'very few UNIX hackers in the
universe', and Sun had a large number of them. These 'experts' were able
to advise the hardware engineers on how to design a better machine by
taking advantage of the UNIX operating system's capabilities." (Clark &
Wheelwright 1993, 190)
9
The fact that Linux contains GNU software is often mentioned by people working on the GNU project:"Variants of the GNU system, using Linux as the kernel, are now widely used; though often called 'Linux', they are
more accurately called GNU/Linux systems." http://www.gnu.ai.mit.edu.
10
"The Berkeley copyright poses no restrictions on private or
commercial use of the software and imposes only simple and uniform
requirements for maintaining copyright notices in redistributed versions
and crediting the originator of the material only in advertising."
(A HREF="http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html">
http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html)
11
General Public License, GNU Copyleft:
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html.
12
The socio-revolutionary opinions on the "fundamental etiquette" and "canonial definition" of free software as voiced with verve by the "flaming sword advocate" Richard Stallman, are not received equally everywhere as far as their form is concerned, but in principle (cf. e.g. Dallheimer 1998, 102, or the article "Is Stallman Stalled" in Wired http://www.wired.com/wired/1.1/departments/electrosphere/stallman.html
.
13
Elementary knowledge of Unix open doors and idiosyncrasies are part of every good introductory book on hacking and phreaking, cf. e.g. The Mentor (1998); Plowsk¥ Phreak (no year given); Sir Hackalot (1990). Garfinkel und Spafford (1991, XIX): "To many
people, 'UNIX security' may seem to be an oxymoron - two words that appear
to contradict each other, much like the words 'jumbo shrimp' or 'Congressional action.' After all, the ease which with a UNIX guru can
break into a system, seize control, and wreak havoc is legendary in the computer community. (...) While UNIX was not designed with military-level security in mind, it was built both to withstand external attacks and to protect users from the accidental or malicious actions of other users on
the system." For people such as Simson Garfinkel and Gene Spafford, who are not only Unix experts but Usenet users as well (a classical combination), one of the ways increasing security is communication, and hence the authors continue: "In many ways UNIX can be more secure than other operating systems because it is better studied: when faults in UNIX are discovered, they are
widely publicized and are, therefore, quickly fixed." (Garfinkel &
Spafford 1991, XIX).
14
The "finger" command can also be used for other things than querying users. The DFN´s Network Operation Center uses this for imparting up-to-date and detailed information on network problems (finger trouble@noc.dfn.de).
15
"A hacker of the old school.", Hackers' Hall of Fame,
http://izzy.online.discovery.com/area/technology/hackers/stallman.html.
16
Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie are revered as "hackers" in the "Hackers´ Hall of Fame" for their archievements as developers, together with less academic but criminal hacker legends such as the phone phreaker John Draper a.k.a Cap´n Crunch, who used an ingenious toy whistle hack which enabled long-distance calls to be made for free, or the first hacker to make the FBI´s "Most Wanted" list, Kevin "condor" Mitnick http://izzy.online.discovery.com/area/technology/hackers/ritchthomp.html.
17
Speech held at the First Dutch International Symposium on Linux,
Amsterdam, December 1994.
18
Sir Hackalot of PHAZE dedicates his "UNIX : A Hacking Tutorial" to the legendary Legion of Doom, for example.
19
Being a Unix activist and an Internet activist is often the same thing. The remailing system, for example, which enables the free anonymous exchange of Internet mail, was developed by an old EUUG activist, the Finn Johan "Julf" Helsingius (anon.penet.fi). He is of course included in the Hacker´s Hall of Fame
http://izzy.online.discovery.com/area/technology/hackers/helsingius.html.
For more on the multiform user group scene, cf. Libes & Ressler 1989, 124f.
20
Source: EurOpen (http://www.europen.org). AMUUG is however listed in the directory of Usenix Local Groups (http://www.usenix.org/membership/LUGS.html).
21
However, the name AMIX corresponds to the name of the mother of all Usergroups, Usenix.
22
Whoever would have thought that Unix groups were among the oldest newsgroups to be found, such as net.jokes, fa.sf-lovers, fa.arms-d or net.math? (Cf. list of nesgroups from 1982 in Hauben & Hauben 1997, 191ff.).
23
Cf. the online discussion "Are you a *LURKER*???" held on The WELL at the Virtual Communities Conference
http://www.well.com/conf/vc/16.html.
And Mandel & Van der Leun (1997, 176): "7" Commandment of Cyberspace: Thou shalt give to the Net if thou willst take from the Net".
24
"The content of a NWG note may be any thought, suggestion,
etc. related to the HOST software or other aspect of the network. Notes
are encouraged to be timely rather than polished. Philosophical positions
without examples or other specifics, specific suggestions or
implementation techniques without introductory or background explication,
and explicit questions without any attempted answers are all acceptable.
The minimum length for a NWG note is one sentence." (RFC 3)
25
LISA: Large Installations Systems Administration. There were around 1200 participants in Monterey.
26
Those interested in statistics can find a large amount of data at and work out how many people in a representative study group, as constituted by the participants of USENIX conferences, really do have beards http://facesaver.usenix.org
27
"The Ninth Commandment of Cyberspace: Thou shalt honour thy sysop and the other Net gods, that the days on the Net shall be many."
(Mandel & Van der Leun 1997, 203)
28
During his job in systems administration, Simon Traviglia described how to deal with systems administrators: "Talk to me and I'll kill -9 you!" ( http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~gowen/BOfH.html)
29
Cf. the alt.sysadmin.recovery FAQ
http://www.cs.ruu.nl/wais/html/na-dir/sysadmin-recovery.html.
30
http://www.SSDeV.org/.
The SSDeV has translated the "MIT Guide to Lock Picking", written by Ted the Tool, into German and uploaded it to the webserver. The sport of lock picking is attributed to the hacker community at MIT and its custom of "Roof and Tunnel Hacking".
31
Cf. Waldrop 1994, 880; Hoffmann 1997, 26; Djordjevic
1998, 31ff., 39; Helmers & Hofmann 1996 and http://spam.abuse.net/spam.
32
Compare the strong reactions to "push media", for example Fey 1997; Winkler 1997a.
33
The Open Source Initiative dates back to February 1998 (http://www.opensource.org/history.html).
34
http://www.w3c.org
, for more on integration policies, cf. .../Policy/statement.html.
| |
